NSC Archives

50 & 20 Years Ago

40 Years Ago: New plant houses have been built ‘inside out’

Taken from Building with Steel 1968

The new exhibition plant and orchid house at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, are structures of unusual shape and design. The buildings have been erected ‘inside-out’  with the supporting structures outside the glazing to protect them from the corrosive conditions normally existing in plant houses.

Designed by the Ministry of Public Building and Works, they are unique buildings which have no internal framework and which depend on support on an intricate external structure of steel tubes and cable from which the glass is suspended.

The design has enabled exotic plants to be displayed in a natural setting on a scale never before achieved in a glasshouse anywhere and it has also minimised the risk of corrosion common to ferrous metals in plant houses.

The new main exhibition house is a single structure encompassing the entire plant area. It is sub-divided into five compartments of differing climatic environments and has an orchid house adjacent to it.

Their spans are 60 ft and 50 ft and their lengths 420 ft and 100 ft respectively. The height to the eaves is 15 ft and to the ridge 28 ft with 36 ft to the large centre section.

The buildings have been erected from east to west for maximum daylight and are intercommunicating with access to the existing Victorian Palm House. The single-span structure gains height in the centre environment by taking advantage of the existing site levels. This permits changes of level to accommodate larger plants and encourages the illusion of natural landscaping.

Preliminary design studies showed that a structural solution of this sort would produce minimum shadow and light interference to the plants inside and at the same time produce an architectural result pleasing and well suited to its position in the Royal Botanic Garden. Initially, the structure was conceived as a three pinned portal of tubular steel members, but as the scheme developed a more subtle shape emerged which may be described as a ‘suspended portal frame’.

This structure, which had to be as light as possible, is a mixture of a basic portal frame and a suspension type structure in which the action of the suspenders relieves the high bending moments in the rafter members, thereby allowing a considerable reduction in their section sizes.

The side framework consists of diamond shaped latticed tetrahedra made up of light tubular members which project upwards above the rafters to twice the height of the eaves. The main tubular members are 3-in diameter, while the lacing members are solid bars ¾-in diameter. The rafters, which are of rectangular hollow section (RHS) 6 in by 3 in, are prevented from sagging by the suspenders, which ride over the apex of each of the side frames. Interaction between the suspenders and the framework also provides resistance to side sway from the wind.

Suspension-type structures depend upon achieving the right forces within the suspenders to maintain them in tension under all conditions. They are prone to more movement than conventional frames and the control of this movement was very necessary because of the large glass areas involved. Because of the delicate balance of the load between the suspension action and the bending resistance of the portal frame, it was necessary to carry out a structural test on a full scale mock up of two bays of the framework and as a result of this a decision was taken to stiffen the rafter members. A computer was used during structural design to establish the correct relative stiffness of portal and suspension action.

Transverse movement in the building has been taken care of by additional internal stiffening panels using aluminium members at two points in the 420 ft length. Internally a 40-ft span prestressed concrete footbridge has been provided linking the east and west environments of the building and at the same time providing a viewing platform about 9 ft above ground level in the large central section.

High yield stress steel to BS 968 was used for the whole of the structural framework, all steel being galvanised by hot dipping. The vertical tetrahedra were too large to be dipped in one piece, but this problem was solved by making each frame in two pieces and protecting the resulting joint after welding with two coats of zinc rich paint. The suspenders were all of ¼-in diameter and because of maintenance difficulties were made from stainless steel wire EN 58 to BS 1554. All external steelwork other than the wires is treated with aluminium paint to provide additional protection, and for aesthetic reasons.

Architect – G A Pierce, ARIBA, FRIAS, assisted by J Johnson ARIBA: Structural Engineers – L R Creasy OBE, BSc(Eng), MICE, MIStructE, F W Walley MSc, MICE, H E Mills AMIStructE.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this post

Related Posts


Click on the cover to view this month's issue as a digimag.